I would dispute the value of the code. The code he took wasn't part of the "secret sauce". It didn't contain any of the logic for actually making High-speed trades.
On what basis, may we ask?
The only statements from the court that I'm aware of are those confirming that a significant amount of proprietary code (in comparison to the amount of OS code) was taken.
But not as to the "value" of the copied bits, or their potential to otherwise wreak havoc.
On what basis, may we ask?
The only statements from the court that I'm aware of are those confirming that a significant amount of proprietary code (in comparison to the amount of OS code) was taken.
But not as to the "value" of the copied bits, or their potential to otherwise wreak havoc.