The analogy omits the thorough criminal trial process that led to his imprisonment, suggesting it was all because the FBI didn't investigate properly.
In actuality he got out because an appeals court found a loophole in the phrasing of the Economic Espionage Act -- which was immediately closed by Congress at the behest of the judge. [1] It had nothing to do with the lack of investigative thoroughness on the part of the FBI.
In actuality he got out because an appeals court found a loophole in the phrasing of the Economic Espionage Act -- which was immediately closed by Congress at the behest of the judge. [1] It had nothing to do with the lack of investigative thoroughness on the part of the FBI.
[1] http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?r112:H18DE2-0051: