This is why I think Apple will do better with Cook, Ive, Federighi, and Schiller as the frontmen. They can collaborate and judge what's best uninterrupted by the arrogant ramblings of Holy Jobs.

I suspect that Apple define success with their own metrics. There are a few measures by which Apple is already the best - which areas do you think a Cook Apple might target? From the short Post-Jobs era, I'd say that Apple was more secretive, and quicker to acknowledge fault.

At the top there are crowds of these... :)

I think you learn everything you need to know about Steve Jobs by looking at the way he pursued his cancer treatment.

Not really. There are millions of people who let their preconceptions screw up health treatments. Very few of them have accomplished as much as Jobs.

Health decisions don't exist in a vacuum.

I believe he was famously intolerant of idiots. Knew him personally did you?

He was also famous for screwing over his friends, idiots, charities, business partners, and his family.

I notice that most of your comments show a level of hostility that's often disproportionate to the topic or comment you are responding to. You seem like a very angry person. It's not very pleasant.