Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm trying to understand what you mean by this. Are you saying they're "bad" in terms of resolution, or artistic value, or something else? They seem good enough (far from "bad") by any definition I can think of.
 help



Resolution != quality

A picture with a boring gaussian blur to fake a bokeh effect is low quality regardless if the end result is in high resolution.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: