Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You're the only one talking about the reference, I'm talking about what makes sense/what logically follows.


The paper is talking about the reference and I'm talking about the reference in the paper.

Btw I think you're overestimating the degree to which what you say "logically follows".


Please do point out where you find the semantic distinction between people and tables in fundamental physics.


I'm sorry, I don't understand the question. Can you please rephrase?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: