Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm not arguing that it shouldn't be opened up. I'm just stating that by being a walled garden it is safer.

When things eventually open up, when Apple is finally forced to permit other app stores on their mobile devices, I'll take a hard pass on them.



"Walled garden" does not mean "safe system". And it is not a prerequisite for a safe system, or vice versa.

You are saying you are happy in a "safe secure system".

In contrast, a "walled garden" is a prohibition on alternatives, not a source of safety. The prohibition of alternatives does not make the App Store safer.

If anything, it protects Apple from competing with safter alternatives! Like an app store only for children. Or an app store of formally verified apps.

Please correct me if I am somehow missing something...


But it is not safer: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39685272

There are still scam apps on Apple and apparently they don't get removed promptly either. This one was reported 12 days before the post was made.

Many of the comments in the thread are telling the poster that he "should have verified the app"

>It's possible that it's just because it was literally called "Bitcoin Wallet", >an exact match for your search, or boosted by fake reviews, or it was actually >an ad that you didn't notice. Though it shouldn't have gotten past review at >all >But I don't really understand why you'd blindly trust some random app?

So not safer, just more restrictive.


Consider these two statements:

1) I happy having a walled garden, I feel safe

2) I am happy being imprisoned in a walled garden with no door, I feel safe


Consider these two scenarios:

1. I choose to buy Apple products because I enjoy the security and features of them, and can leave the ecosystem anytime I choose to.

2. I'm indentured to Apple, Tim Cook owns my soul and the souls of my children, and we can never escape.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: