Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Have to +1 this. A lot (most?) of NASA's funding is directed toward keeping people employed and skilled, as opposed to accomplishing goals, as with a lot of government money. NASA could do a LOT more with the funding they already have, if they were willing to divest from older technologies and vendors, but the politics of its funding doesn't allow that.


> A lot (most?) of NASA's funding is directed toward keeping people employed and skilled, as opposed to accomplishing goals

This is so hilarious wrong I don't even know where to start.

> but the politics of its funding doesn't allow that.

The post that you are agreeing with says that "funding" is not the reason for their plan.


> This is so hilarious wrong I don't even know where to start.

Anywhere at all would be better than nowhere. I worked for a defense contractor for a few years, so I'm basing my comment on my experience there.

> The post that you are agreeing with says that "funding" is not the reason for their plan.

Not sure what you are saying here.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: