... it's just the article notes a subcontractor has already been convicted of fraud and kickbacks, so this might not have been a project quite like the projects you describe (though if this is a Terry Childs-type case, I'd love to hear about it).
Sorry, I meant to imply that that's just the way things are, however, after the realization that he'd been convicted, it's likely that whether he's done anything wrong on this particular project, he's drawn the scapegoat straw.
I meant to say those things, but got lost in typing so much other nonsense and trailed off. Thanks for bringing it up.
I wouldn't be so sure. One thing that working in government has taught me is that the bad contractors seem to be equal or greater proportion to the good.
They would bid on something if they weren't going to find a way to make more than what the original contract was for because in the bid wars they often lower the bids so much they have to recoup somehow. In this case they probably did not build the recoup method into the contract and did it illegally.
... it's just the article notes a subcontractor has already been convicted of fraud and kickbacks, so this might not have been a project quite like the projects you describe (though if this is a Terry Childs-type case, I'd love to hear about it).