> Sorry to flatly contradict you, but the size of Apple’s cut is not at all controversial. It has never been a crime to be expensive.
Of course it's controversial. Why should 30% be acceptable? Why not 50% or 70%? Or only 5%?
If you look at the app store revenue done by Apple and if you would be able look at the true cost of running it, one can agree that the huge markup is a racket.
Of course it's controversial. Why should 30% be acceptable? Why not 50% or 70%? Or only 5%?
If you look at the app store revenue done by Apple and if you would be able look at the true cost of running it, one can agree that the huge markup is a racket.