Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>An investigative journalist wouldn't suggest to their source that they cover their trails

An investigative journalist should absolutely try to help their source stay safe from danger.

>by trying to crack someone else's password to use to get access to the same documents you're effectively _setting that person up_ as a patsy

The account they were attempting to access was a generic windows admin account tied to nobody. A perfect patsy.



> An investigative journalist should absolutely try to help their source stay safe from danger.

I'm not sure "commit more federal crimes" is "staying safe from danger"

> The account they were attempting to access was a generic windows admin account tied to nobody. A perfect patsy.

This I did not know. My above point still stands, but at least no innocent third parties are being also dragged into things, absolutely.


>I'm not sure "commit more federal crimes" is "staying safe from danger"

If your options are "commit more victimless federal crimes" or "allow the army to punish you" it is.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: