Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Nobody owns content as ownership does not expire. People are incentivized to create content with a limited monopoly of finite duration. However, this means when they fail to licence it and thus chose to forgo revenue there is zero moral obligation to respect the monopoly.


Watterson famously refused to license Calvin and Hobbes. That does not give you the moral right to start selling C&H branded content.


Jumping from pirating for personal consumption to selling someone else's IP is a bit much, don't you think?


It’s kind of an interesting edge case.

Trademarks don’t have set expiration dates, yet 1/4 of Disney’s toys are for someone else’s original IP. Snow White, Peter Pan, etc and nobody seems to have a problem with this. In fact the oldest US trademark in use fall under the same heading with a Biblical figure Samson wrestling a lion.

And in fact Trademarks do go away without Defence. Which means they can be abandoned at which point it’s fine to use em.


No one's talking about reselling Disney+ content.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: