>A lot of effort has gone into this; it's a shame to see so many disparaging posts here. I think the developers should be applauded for their work.
bad work is bad. GNOME developers are again ditching code that works (and it sucks).
http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html
>This is, I think, the most common way for my bug reports to open source software projects to ever become closed. I report bugs; they go unread for a year, sometimes two; and then (surprise!) that module is rewritten from scratch -- and the new maintainer can't be bothered to check whether his new version has actually solved any of the known problems that existed in the previous version.
bad work is bad. GNOME developers are again ditching code that works (and it sucks).
http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html >This is, I think, the most common way for my bug reports to open source software projects to ever become closed. I report bugs; they go unread for a year, sometimes two; and then (surprise!) that module is rewritten from scratch -- and the new maintainer can't be bothered to check whether his new version has actually solved any of the known problems that existed in the previous version.